| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
481. What's the future of the EVE Online Graphics Engine? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Just Another Toon wrote: Sader Rykane wrote: Point me to one MMO that is as old as Eve Online that looks as good as Eve Online? Thats not an excuse is it? But shall we say x3 (yes its no mmo) buts its still over 5 years old and looks b...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.13 13:39:00
|
482. What's the future of the EVE Online Graphics Engine? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Although the OP is wrong, NEW EFFECTS AND SKYBOXES WOULD BE NICE...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.13 13:25:00
|
483. Gallente - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
MeBiatch wrote: plus still look at the eagle with 250's and spike you are doing 190 dps at like 220 km or some crazyness... but whats the point in doing crappy dps at that range? i would much rather see a rate of fire bonus on the eagle then a...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.13 13:17:00
|
484. Dreadnoughts Aren't Dreadnaughts - they are Trebuchets - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Although I don't believe in the concept of dreads being solo pwn mobiles, I do believe dreadnoughts should have a discernible advantage over the other capitals at specific things. I'd give it 3 more highslots (no new weapon hardpoints) I'd doubl...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.13 12:47:00
|
485. What's the future of the EVE Online Graphics Engine? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
People whine about having to ditch their 10 year old graphics cards to support SM3, why the hell would the trinity engine be facing another core redesign? The reality is that they can just add new shaders whenever they need to, new models and hig...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.13 12:16:00
|
486. The Deimos!!!!!!!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Basically...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.11 23:52:00
|
487. Gallente - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Alticus C Bear wrote: Oh and how about 5 bandwidth and drone bay per level for the CPU subsystem for the proteus. Should not be overpowered as you have to sacrifice probing, increased sensor strength or scram range to get the full bandwith for...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.11 23:51:00
|
488. Gallente - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Alticus C Bear wrote: I like your ammo proposals, it's freaky I had been thinking about proposing a reversal of the kin therm ratio for half the ammo's. Thank - MeBiatch. Although most of his ideas where crazy, part of his ammo one stood out ...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.11 23:40:00
|
489. Gallente - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
~~~New Updates based on feedback.~~~ Caldari Lovin: Caldari base speed increases significantly. Caldari hybrid ships, especially the cruisers are just to slow to be viable and often whilst existential issues really effect the performance of ...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.11 23:26:00
|
490. Gallente - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
@Alticus C Bear - I agree with you on the Ammo changes, iridium, thorium have their uses, but the rest are kinda pointless. Previous iterations included a high tracking version of Javelin that did nearly the damage of antimatter, with a similar ca...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.11 22:26:00
|
491. FAO CCP Tallest, CCP Soundwave: Pilot Satisfaction - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Robert Caldera wrote: wall of text from a cheater guy. didnt read No CCP Tallest wrote: Did someone say my name? Good post. Would read again. Pattern is a pretty cool guy. he posts sensibly about balancing and doesnGÇÖt afraid of anyth...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.11 20:45:00
|
492. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Quote: Normally I don't say this, but damn, these tears are delicious. You whiners realize that people flew moms even before they were buffed? People complained back then, but they still built them and put them into an alt, albeit motherships ...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.11 16:48:00
|
493. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Yeah, there really needs to be a definitive statement on what each class of capitals is for, atm, we're kinda lost.
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.11 12:53:00
|
494. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Tallest wrote: In this thread, I've read several very good reasons why the fighter change is a bad idea. You are right. Fighters should stay the way they are. The change would be unfair for carriers. The poor performance of Minmatar capita...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.11 11:38:00
|
495. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Also, what do fighters do exactly?
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.10 18:59:00
|
496. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I'll rephrase, what specifically are the roles of each class of capital ship combat wise? It kinda feels like this is a very reactionary (although necessary change) that lacks the *vision* needed to be understood by us.
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.10 18:37:00
|
497. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
BAD: No remote tracking link / titan tracking nerf - (Make Ewar immunity = no RTL's or any other form of electronic remote assistance) BAD: No shield/armor EHP balancing - (deadspace invuls) BAD: No real solution to supercarrier/titan roles - (the...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.10 18:27:00
|
498. Gallente - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ITT someone fails to comprehend the difference between the words "tier", and "tech".
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.09 23:37:00
|
499. Active tanking bonuses, a straight up and down vote. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Needs more voting.
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.08 01:16:00
|
500. Gallente - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This isn't about shields vs armor. It's about how on some ships I can have more armor than I have the cap charges to rep. It's about how unless your flighing against total scrubs, whatever tank you have can be easily dealt with. It's about the fit...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.08 01:12:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |